Radiology Medical Billing Services - Compare Quotes From Vetted Providers
Share a few details about your practice and get matched with billing partners that fit your EHR, claim volume, and goals.
Built for busy Radiology teams
Whether you manage a single site or a multi provider group, this page helps you decide if outsourcing billing is a smart move now.
Office Managers
Ease staffing stress and overdue A/R
Practice Admins
Standardize reporting and KPIs
Physician Owners
Protect margins and reduce denials
how it works
1. Tell us about your practice
Share your specialty, monthly claim volume, EHR, locations, and where you’re feeling the pinch; denials, AR follow-up, coding, credentialing, or reporting. The more context you provide, the tighter the match and the more precise the pricing and timelines you’ll receive.
2. We match vetted providers
We screen our network for fit by specialty, EHR experience, payer mix, and service model (full-service vs. augmentation). Each option is pre-vetted on KPIs, references, and compliance. You’ll see a short list of providers that can actually support your workflows, not a blast to dozens of vendors.
3. Compare quotes & choose
Review clear, apples-to-apples proposals—fees, scope of work, onboarding timelines, and reporting cadence—plus any optional add-ons like coding or credentialing. We’ll highlight key decision factors so you can compare confidently and move from kickoff to first clean claims without surprises.
Vetted providers with proven Radiology Billing experience
- HIPAA compliant operations and signed BAAs
- Dedicated denial prevention playbooks
- Monthly reporting cadence with action items
- Referenceable client work in pathology medicine
- EHR proficiency and clearinghouse familiarity
- Eligibility, charge capture, coding support, claim scrubbing and submission
- Payment posting, denials, patient statements, analytics
- Regular re-verification for performance and compliance
Work with The tools you already use
- Athenahealth
- Epic
- Kareo
- NextGen
- AdvancedMD
- and more.
Radiology billing Has Unique Challenges
Radiology billing hinges on component splits, modality-specific rules, and strict order and documentation requirements. Getting contrast use, laterality, supervision, and image counts right keeps claims clean and protects margins.
Component billing is the default
- Most imaging allows split billing. Use modifier 26 for the professional interpretation and modifier TC for the technical component when different entities bill. Submit the global code only when you own both components and payer rules allow it.
- Place of service and ownership determine who may bill each component. Confirm where the scan was performed and who owns the equipment.
Orders and medical necessity
- Every study must have a valid order that matches modality, body part, laterality, and contrast status.
- Link ICD-10 diagnoses to the clinical indication on the order and report. For common screening or surveillance scenarios, use the correct screening codes.
Contrast, phases, and sequences
- CT and MRI coding changes based on contrast use. Document without contrast, with contrast, or both without and with contrast, and ensure the claim mirrors the final report.
- Multi-phase liver or renal protocols may have specific code families. Align documentation with the protocol performed.
Guidance and interventional radiology
- Many image-guided procedures include guidance in the primary code. When separate guidance is allowed, ensure the note includes modality, target, approach, and confirmation of needle or catheter position.
- For interventional radiology, capture all billable components: access, catheter placements by vascular family, diagnostic imaging when not bundled, therapeutic service, closure, and moderate sedation when not inherently included.
Supervision levels and incident-to in imaging centers
- Technical services require the appropriate level of physician supervision per modality. Ensure supervision levels are met and documented in policies and schedules.
Views, limited vs complete, and image counts
- Plain film radiography requires the number of views to support code selection.
- Ultrasound must document limited vs complete criteria by anatomic area and include required elements. Vascular duplex studies need both B-mode imaging and Doppler to meet the code definition.
3D post-processing and advanced reconstructions
- Bill 3D rendering only when performed and documented with independent workstation post-processing. The report should describe datasets, reformats, and clinical utility.
Laterality and modifier usage
- Use RT, LT, or appropriate site modifiers when required by payer policy.
- Consider 59 or X modifiers when distinct non-overlapping studies of different anatomic regions are performed and edits bundle services.
- Append 52 for reduced services when a complete study was intended but not fully performed, and 53 for discontinued procedures when applicable.
Prior authorization and site-of-care rules
- Advanced imaging often requires prior authorization. Capture auth numbers at scheduling and transmit with the claim.
- Some payers steer MRI and CT to freestanding sites. Verify site-of-care rules before scheduling to avoid denials.
Critical results and turn-around documentation
- Document communication of time-sensitive or critical findings to the treating provider. Many quality programs require this and auditors review it.
Is Outsourcing Right for You?
Keeping billing in-house can work well when you have a stable team, predictable volume, and the capacity to hire, train, and cover vacations or turnover. You retain tight control over workflows but you also carry the risk and cost of staffing, QA, software, and performance management.
Outsourcing shifts those burdens to a specialized team that brings SLAs, denial management, and scalable capacity. It’s often a fit when claim volume is growing, denials are creeping up, or leadership wants to redeploy staff to patient-facing work without sacrificing cash flow.
In-House | Outsourced | |
---|---|---|
Cost | Salaries, benefits, software, training | Percentage of collections or hybrid |
Staffing Risk | Coverage gaps and turnover | Scaled teams with redundancy |
Expertise | Generalist knowledge | Deeper specialty expertise |
Tech Stack | Depends on budget | Scrubbers, analytics, clearinghouse tools |
Reporting | Varies by staff skill | Scheduled KPI reviews and trend analysis |
SLAs | Informal | Contracted response and rework times |
Scalability | Slower hiring cycle | Elastic capacity during peaks |
Compliance | Internal audits | External audits and oversight |
FAQs
Typically 3-5 options, depending on your specialty, volume, and region.
Just business details to match you with providers: specialty, claims volume, EHR, region, and contact. No PHI.
We review capabilities, references, compliance attestations, and core KPIs.